<source id="3oodw" ><sup id="3oodw" ></sup></source>

      1. <s id="3oodw" ><th id="3oodw" ><small id="3oodw" ></small></th></s>
        <i id="3oodw" ><optgroup id="3oodw" ></optgroup></i>

            <input id="3oodw" ><bdo id="3oodw" ><cite id="3oodw" ></cite></bdo></input>
            <delect id="3oodw" ><ruby id="3oodw" ></ruby></delect>

            <em id="3oodw" ><progress id="3oodw" ></progress></em><input id="3oodw" ></input>
            <strike id="3oodw" ></strike>
            Supreme Court of the United States
             

            Today at the Court - Wednesday, Mar 4, 乐福彩票手机app下载


            • The Supreme Court Building is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
            • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear one, one-hour oral argument.
            • Courtroom Lectures available within the next 30 days.
            Calendar
            Title and navigation
            Title and navigation
            <<<March 乐福彩票手机app下载><<
            March 乐福彩票手机app下载
            SMTWTFS
                   
            1234567
            891011121314
            15161718192021
            22232425262728
            293031    
            Calendar Info/Key

             


            Oral Arguments

            Week of Monday, March 2


            Monday, March 2
                   
            Nasrallah v. Barr, Att'y Gen. (18-1432)
                   
            Dept. of 乐福彩票手机app下载land Sec. v. Thuraissigiam (19-161)


            Tuesday, March 3
                   
            Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Protection Bureau (19-7)
                   
            Liu v. SEC (18-1501)


            Wednesday, March 4
                   
            June Medical Serv. v. Russo, Interim Sec., LA Dept. of Health (18-1323)
                   
            Russo, Interim Sec., LA Dept. of Health v. June Medical Serv. (18-1460)
            Consolidated



            The transcripts of oral arguments are posted on this website on the same day an argument is heard by the Court. Same-day transcripts are considered official but subject to final review. The audio recordings of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are available to the public at the end of each argument week. The audio recordings are posted on Fridays after Conference.


            Earlier Transcripts | Earlier Audio

            Recent Decisions


            March 03, 乐福彩票手机app下载
                     
            Kansas v. Garcia (17-834)
            The Kansas statutes under which respondents, three unauthorized aliens, were convicted—for fraudulently using another person’s Social Security number on state and federal tax-withholding forms submitted to their employers—are not expressly preempted by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986; and respondents’ argument that those laws are preempted by implication is rejected.



            February 26, 乐福彩票手机app下载
                     
            Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm. v. Sulyma (18-1116)
            Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 requirement that plaintiffs with “actual knowledge” of an alleged fiduciary breach must file suit within three years of gaining that knowledge, 29 U. S. C. §1113(2), a plaintiff does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading.

                     
            Holguin-Hernandez v. United States (18-7739)
            Petitioner’s district-court argument for a specific sentence (nothing or less than 12 months) preserved, for purposes of Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 51(b), his claim on appeal that the sentence imposed was unreasonably long.

                     
            Shular v. United States (18-6662)
            For purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act’s sentence enhancement for a defendant convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm who has at least three convictions for “serious drug offense[s],” 18 U. S. C. §924(e)(1), the “serious drug offense” definition requires only that a state offense involve the conduct specified in the statute; it does not require that the state offense match certain generic offenses.



            More Opinions...

            Did You Know...

            The Figure of Justice


            The figure of Justice  is one of the most recognized legal symbols in the architecture of the Supreme Court Building. Justice  appears without a blindfold in one of the panels of the Courtroom frieze. A small figure of Justice  with a blindfold, symbolizing impartiality, appears in the sculpture Contemplation of Justice  to the left of the main steps, and in each of the bases of the marble lampposts in front of the building.

             

            A depiction of Justice carved into the marble lamppost bases on the front plaza of the building. Designed by the John Donnelly studio of New York, each base shows a bas-relief of Justice with a blindfold, holding scales in her left hand and a sword in her right.
            A depiction of Justice carved into the marble lamppost bases on the front plaza of the building. Designed by the John Donnelly studio of New York, each base shows a bas-relief of Justice  with a blindfold, holding scales in her left hand and a sword in her right.
            Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States


            SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543